ID :
126935
Wed, 06/09/2010 - 13:54
Auther :
Shortlink :
http://m.oananews.org//node/126935
The shortlink copeid
Khaza'ie: Some Western states efforts to pass anti-Iran resolution, big mistake
New York, June 9, IRNA – Iran’s Ambassador and permanent representative in UN said three western countries effort to approve a new resolution against Iran at Security Council would be a big mistake and their hasty action would deviate interaction road from its natural route.
He stressed that such a move indicates that the other sides have chosen the confrontation approach, so in this case, Iran has no other alternative except facing a second choice.
Mohammad Khazaei said that during last two days, some permanent members of the Security Council had been actively trying to convene council’s meeting to issue a resolution against Iran.
The Tehran Declaration was issued thanks to collaboration of two member countries of the Security Council and was going to open a new path for interaction and to create a broader ground for constructive cooperation in international and regional level.
The ambassador said that in Iranian government and nation's view such hasty actions deviate the path towards interaction from its natural route and indicate that the other sides have chosen the confrontation approach, so Tehran has no other alternative but to choose an appropriate way to face the second way.
He added that unfortunately the recent acts, especially by Britain, Washington and Paris show that they are not honest in their dialogues with other members of the Security Council and in fact the exchange issue was just a pretext.
Khaza'ei continued that this is a big mistake and it should be condemned by the international society.
Do not forget that these countries and the Security Council could not take a decision against obvious attack of the Zionist regime against the international Freedom Flotilla.
And this is a double standard which will not be forgotten in the historical memory of the Iranian and other world nations.
The ambassador argued while the US and a few other permanent members of the Security Council got angry hearing the request of 192 UN member countries from the Zionist regime to join the NPT and to destruct its own nuclear weapons, in case of Iran, which is a member of NPT and has no nuclear weapon, why should they adopt such harsh stands?
He argued, "The other members of the council, too, should ask the themseves the same question, before voting for the controversial resolution."/end
He stressed that such a move indicates that the other sides have chosen the confrontation approach, so in this case, Iran has no other alternative except facing a second choice.
Mohammad Khazaei said that during last two days, some permanent members of the Security Council had been actively trying to convene council’s meeting to issue a resolution against Iran.
The Tehran Declaration was issued thanks to collaboration of two member countries of the Security Council and was going to open a new path for interaction and to create a broader ground for constructive cooperation in international and regional level.
The ambassador said that in Iranian government and nation's view such hasty actions deviate the path towards interaction from its natural route and indicate that the other sides have chosen the confrontation approach, so Tehran has no other alternative but to choose an appropriate way to face the second way.
He added that unfortunately the recent acts, especially by Britain, Washington and Paris show that they are not honest in their dialogues with other members of the Security Council and in fact the exchange issue was just a pretext.
Khaza'ei continued that this is a big mistake and it should be condemned by the international society.
Do not forget that these countries and the Security Council could not take a decision against obvious attack of the Zionist regime against the international Freedom Flotilla.
And this is a double standard which will not be forgotten in the historical memory of the Iranian and other world nations.
The ambassador argued while the US and a few other permanent members of the Security Council got angry hearing the request of 192 UN member countries from the Zionist regime to join the NPT and to destruct its own nuclear weapons, in case of Iran, which is a member of NPT and has no nuclear weapon, why should they adopt such harsh stands?
He argued, "The other members of the council, too, should ask the themseves the same question, before voting for the controversial resolution."/end
