ID :
213223
Fri, 10/28/2011 - 13:55
Auther :

OIC and Turkish religious affairs heads express uneasiness about visuals

RIYADH/ANKARA (A.A) – October 28, 2011 – The heads of Organization of the Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and Turkey's Religious Affairs Directorate expressed on Friday uneasiness about the visuals showing ousted Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi killed by National Transitional Council forces.
OIC Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu said that the treatment towards ousted Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi was inhumane.
"There is no excuse for such treatment. Moreover, everybody wished that he was captured and taken to court", added Ihsanoglu in an exclusive interview with AA.
"Gadhafi should be brought before court in his country because he cruelly killed people without judgement and defense during his 40-year rule. He supported terrorist movements not only in his country but also in many other countries. Thus, this cannot be forgotten and ignored", said Ihsanoglu.
"However, this was not an appropriate end for him. It did not comply with Libyan people. It also did not comply with Islamic manners and war rules," added Ihsanoglu.
Moreover, Mehmet Gormez, the head of Turkey's Religious Affairs Directorate, said images showing ousted Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi killed did not comply with Islamic manners.
Gormez said even cruel people deserved trial, and those who did not know how to try the cruel within ethical and legal framework could not fulfil requirements of legal rules for the oppressed.
"However cruel a person is, killing him/her by torture does not help justice prevail but harm justice," Gormez told AA correspondent.
Gormez also said the visuals showing how Gadhafi was killed and their transmission in social media organs did not comply with Islamic manners.
Gadhafi was killed by National Transitional Council forces on October 20 near Sirte, Libya.
On October 27, the Organization of Asia-Pacific News Agencies (OANA) President, Anadolu Agency Executive Board Chairman and Director General Kemal Ozturk sent a letter to OANA members regarding widespread use of Gadhafi's images after his death. 
Ozturk said that widespread use and distribution of visuals of ousted Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi, who was killed last week, that undermined human dignity was disturbing.
Kemal Ozturk said the widespread use and distribution of visuals trongly violated media ethics and human dignity
"Every human being, whether an innocent victim or a world-wide famous tyrant and dictator, deserves a private death. Media ethics adopted across the globe, The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, International Criminal Court, American Broadcasting Act 1994, International Court of Justice, International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, every religion and creed ask us to show this minimum respect to an individual," he said.
Ozturk said, "the Universal Declaration of Human Rights grants every human being 'the right to life, liberty and security of person' and says 'No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.' Even in a war, everyone is entitled to a fair and public trial whatever the charges against him or her,"
"Editorial guidelines of many international news organizations stress the importance of respect for privacy of the individual and protecting the dignity of the dead," he said.
Kemal Ozturk said, "their style books strictly warn their staff against portraying graphic material of human suffering and distress, broadcasting moment of death as well as portrayal of close-ups of faces, heavy injuries and scars of violence," he said.
Following the rules of respect for human dignity and privacy world media in common consent withheld the gruesome pictures of Gaddafi's victims in Lockerbie many years ago. However, the same rules were not applied to his death.
What on earth has happened to the ethical rules that these renowned news organizations called universal and why were they ignored when they got hold of shocking pictures of Gaddafi and his sons being lynched?
Some extremely horrific images that could even be called as “death pornography” were emblazoned on front pages of many mainstream papers and TV screens around the world. Unfortunately all the international news agencies helped the spread of these images in their rush to compete.
We, as Anadolu Agency, refused to carry these pictures and video clips. We found them both offensive and in violation of media ethics and human rights.
Images and visuals help shape the collective memory of human history. Pictures of blood and gore and indecency deflects the focus of the story and cheapen human life, incite people to hatred and more violence.
These images are culturally offensive and insensitive too and reinforce the unjustified and unfair depiction of Muslims around the world as uncivilized, violent and barbarian people.
As the President of OANA, I firmly believe that we should discuss all these issues at the 50th anniversary meeting of our organization in Bangkok, Thailand in December and define new editorial guidelines.
We as news agencies have in recent years focused our discussions more on new technologies and new media platforms. However, it is time we should go back to our core activity of reporting and discuss our attitudes in the face of terror, violence, uprisings, wars between ethnic and religious groups and natural disasters."

X